Bradley Manning's acquittal today on the most serious charge against him, aiding the enemy, may not mean much in terms of his freedom—he could well spend the rest of his life in prison anyway. But that specific decision still has huge implications for the nation. A sample of pro and con views:
- Great decision: A guilty verdict on the charge would have been disastrous, writes Fred Kaplan at Slate. "By this logic, any published criticism of an American war, or of US foreign policy generally, could be interpreted as 'aiding the enemy' if copies were found in enemy hands." Wouldn't that make stories about Abu Ghraib traitorous? Manning did violate military conduct, as he himself has admitted, and will serve his time accordingly. But he has insisted that he never set out to deliberately aid al-Qaeda. "The military court’s assent on that point was wise, beneficial for free speech, and for the country."